I just got an e-mail from an old comrade and occasional ZNet commentator: "All out October 27 to end this fucking war. Please watch and distribute widely. http://youtube.com/watch?v=76lZC_o95gE."
Here's a direct hyperlink of the video - it rocks.
Main Demo Site: http://www.oct27.org/
Okay. Everybody listen up. Now. Repeat after your
Commander-in-Chief, and be sure to get it right.
"[T]his government does not torture people. You
know, we stick to U.S. law and our international
obligations." "The policy of the United States is not to torture. The President has not authorized it. He will not authorize it." "I will reiterate to you once again that we do not torture. We want to make sure that we keep this country safe." "[L]et's back up and be very clear. You've heard Dana Perino say it today. You heard the president say it numerous times -- the United States does not torture." "We do not torture. And the fact is no matter how we treat detainees, Al Qaeda, when they capture our soldiers in uniform, will still torture and behead them. How we treat detainees is not going to affect that."
Pakistan's regional and global significance cannot be
overstated, and is expanding. It sits at the crossroads
of the Middle East and South Asia, two regions of
great cultural importance, growing economic power,
and enormous political consequence. President Musharraf joins us today to talk about his country's place in this changing world, to discuss peace and development in his nation and beyond. We at Columbia are eager to listen. As a community of scholars and as students and faculty who come from everywhere in the world, we take a great scholarly and personal interest in what the President has to say. The development in Pakistan over the past several years, from its economic growth to its fight against extremism and terrorism, are vital issues for all of us.
-- Columbia University President Lee C. Bollinger, September 16, 2005
"Hitler Lives." "Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Unreality
Show." "Iranian Madman Walks Among Us." "[A]
grave threat to the United States and its allies in
the Middle East, Europe, and globally." "What Can
We Learn from a Monster?" "His ideology of hatred
and Iran's building of a nuclear weapon to implement that ideology are the greatest threats to civilization as we know it." "[B]razenly provocative or astonishingly uneducated." "[F]anatics and tyrants." "[P]President of a country that is probably the greatest sponsor of state terrorism." "[V]ows regularly to destroy the country [of Israel]." "Normal craziness." "[A] petty and cruel dictator." "[L]ittle weasel." You get the picture.
Not for some time have citizens of the Western world
been made so acutely aware of the politics of language.
This issue has moved from muttering gripes about po-
litical correctness onto the center stage of public con-
sciousness. Bush, Blair & Co. have made war on words -- blown them up, strafed and up-ended them, or simply tortured their true meaning in dystopian style. Hundreds of thousands have died, and many more have suffered injury, neglect, humiliation and the destruction of all means of material security. Their hearts and minds division, the Western press, has often been complicit with this exercise of abusive power, overwhelmingly falling-in behind elite political/business agendas, re-articulating the political class’s “doublethink” that resonates so bleakly with the operations of the state in Orwell's 1984. Consequently, “doublethink” functions as a reactionary resolution of class, gender, race and other divisions acted out in foreign and domestic policy. -- For unrepresentative power, “Ignorance is Strength.”
This afternoon, Thursday, September 20, the United
States took yet another serious step in the direction
of a closed society. By an overwhelming margin of
72 to 25, the Senate voted to adopt an amendment sponsored by Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas "To express the sense of the Senate that General David II. Petraeus, Commanding General, Multi-National Force-Iraq, deserves the full support of the Senate and strongly condemn personal attacks on the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all members of the United States Armed Forces" -- more appropriately known as the Let's strongly condemn the MoveOn.org group for its September 10 statement in the New York Times, and let's make damn sure that this kind of un-American funny business never happens again. (See "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?")
On Thursday, September 6, the very same day that the
Israeli Air Force carried out a bombing raid in northern
Syria for still-undisclosed reasons -- unless it's an
obvious reason, such as testing the performance of
the kind of Russian-built surface-to-air missile defense
system that Iran also has been stocking-up-on in anticipa-
tion of the worst -- i.e., a "clear message to Iran" -- UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and his spokesperson Michèle Montas issued statements that covered (among other ground) the fact that the Secretary-General had participated in a joint news conference earlier that day in Khartoum with Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir, where the two of them pledged to work for peace in Darfur, and announced that negotiations to this end are to be held in Libya on October 27.
A heads-up for a couple of things:
(1) There's an FCC hearing in Chicago scheduled for next Thursday, September 20. Chicagoans and folks in the midwest U.S. are encouraged to attend. More details are here and here. In anticipation of the hearing, I've made this video (my very first YouTube video):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvtByjyGRv4
ZNet readers will be particularly interested in this video, given how I finish it.
Obviously. Because scintillating commentator and analyst David Brooks said so. On the PBS Newshour (well, it IS an hour long, but is it news?), Brooks was talking about the latest videotape by Osama bin Laden, and Brooks said:
All Europe contributed to the making of Kurtz; and
by and by I learned that, most appropriately, the
International Society for the Suppression of Savage
Customs had entrusted him with the making of a re-
port, for its future guidance. And he had written it, too. I've seen it. I've read it. It was eloquent, vibrating with eloquence, but too high-strung, I think. Seventeen pages of close writing he had found time for! But this
If, say, the Overlords in Arthur C. Clarke's sci-fi
novel Childhood's End had shocked and awed
the planet Earth some time in early 2003, and
were currently occupying large swaths of the
continental United States, then I, not only as a
U.S. citizen, but more importantly as a citizen
of the world, do hope that I could count on
something greater than just 67 percent of global human opinion to demand that these foreign forces -- alien forces, in fact, in every sense of the word -- withdraw from U.S. territory immediately -- or as quickly as possible. And go the hell back -- not just to a base on the moon or to an extended orbit around our planet -- but to their own goddam planet. Which is where they rightly belong. And never should have left in the first place.
The Washington regime continues to lay out its
case for war with Iran -- not the least of which is
how little success it has enjoyed at militarily sub-
jugating the population of Iraq. In a speech
Tuesday before the National Convention of the American Legion in Reno, Nevada -- though Las Vegas would have been a better venue -- the Commander-in-Chief warned of the "two main strains" of "violent Islamic radicalism" that "means to dominate the Middle East": On the one hand, "Sunni extremism, embodied by al Qaida and its terrorist allies," and on the other, "Shia extremism, supported and embodied by the regime that sits in Tehran." Notice that only the latter "extremism" was identified with a particular state, its government (the "world's leading state sponsor of terrorism"), and a society. "Iran backs Hezbollah who are trying to undermine the democratic government of Lebanon," the Commander asserted. He continued:
Norman Finkelstein demonstrates guts that few academicians possess. Chicago Tribune reporter and ex-academician Ron Grossman should be ashamed. What will DePaul faculty do?
As a onetime history teacher, I have an odd habit developed over many hours of grading. I often mark up things I read, adding commentary in the margins. The commentary is generally addressed to the author by first name.
During a recent and ongoing stay in Chicago, one thing that I’ve been noticing is an especially large number of people begging on the streets of the downtown (what is called “the Loop”). There’s always a lot of panhandling in the city but this summer it seems especially intense and ubiquitous. Desperately poor people are all over the place it looks like.
I am not certain when the very first time was that
a senior U.S. Government official tried to link Tehran
to the Iraqi resistance's successful use of "explosively
formed penetrators" (EFPs and the like -- recall the
earlier term "improvised explosive devices," or IEDs)
against the occupying forces. But I distinctly recall one famous occasion on February 2, 2006, when the then-director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte told the Senate's Select Committee on Intelligence that "Tehran has been responsible for at least some of the increasing lethality of anti-Coalition attacks by providing Shia militants with the capability to build IEDs with explosively formed projectiles similar to those developed by Iran and Lebanese Hizballah." So let's count this as the first instance -- even if somebody can name an earlier one -- and proceed from here.